GIB® Plasterboard

0
GIB® Plasterboard
GIB® Plasterboard is an Android app from Winstone Wallboards in the Books & Reference category, currently rated — across few ratings. Initial signal reads as mostly critical sentiment so far: users flag rough edges and unmet expectations.
Quality Score is 0: Niche (micro-niche or pre-traction stage). For a Books & Reference app, that means micro-niche or pre-traction stage. The full BU Investment Matrix below scores 8 dimensions including monetisation, growth, and operational risk.
Track changes month-over-month in the Performance section below: live snapshot history and revenue forecast included.
- Title & subtitle keyword fit
- Description hook & conversion structure
- Screenshots, ratings, reviews strategy
📊 Performance Tracking LIVE
Synthetic estimate. Inputs: category complexity, file size, screen count, monetization layer, platform reach, age × team-size proxy. Calibrated against 2024-2026 indie-agency rate surveys. Full math + source list on /methodology.
| 🧱 MVP baseline (design + 1-store ship) | +$28K |
| 📱 5 unique screens × $4.5K | +$22K |
| ⚙ Books & Reference complexity ×0.95 | $-2525 |
| 🌐 Cross-platform reach (iOS + Android) | +$26K |
| ⚙ 8.8y maintenance × ~1-person team | +$52K |
Heuristic guess from app bundle size, category, store description signals, and release-date stack era. Bumetric does not disassemble binaries — for binary-level certainty you would need an SDK intelligence tool or the manifest itself. Reasoning chain on the right. Full ruleset on /methodology.
| 🏷 Category context | Books & Reference |
| 📦 Compact Android bundle | → Native Kotlin |
Heuristic risk score from time-since-last-update + ratings velocity proxy + Editor's Choice / curated featuring signals. Calibrated against 2024-2025 app-store ranking decay reports. Not a guarantee — a quiet app with a healthy codebase looks the same as an abandoned one until something breaks. Full math on /methodology.
| 📅 1y 8mo since last update | Likely deprioritized |
How we forecast this revenue
LOW CONFIDENCEBU Investment Matrix
Insufficient data · 28/100MICRO TIERtoo early to score- 💰 Revenue: Marginal — $0 - $500/mo · MICRO tier · indicative confidence, trajectory unclear.
- ⭐ Quality: None★ across 0 reviews — weak — significant quality concerns.
- 📍 Market: Not yet charting in any of the 9 monitored markets.
- 📈 Growth: ⚠ last update 629d ago — possibly dormant.
- ⚠️ Risk: Moderate — dormant (629d since update).
💰 Forecast Revenue / mo
MODEL📈 Reviews Growth
LIVE⭐ Rating Trend
LIVEProfile & Insights
Identification
- App name
- GIB® Plasterboard
- Developer
- Winstone Wallboards
- Bundle ID
- com.a15084546830905784059
- App Store URL
- Open in App Store
- Category
- Books & Reference
- Content rating
- Not found
- Languages
- Not found
Company
- Website
- www.gib.co.nz
- Tagline
- Not found
- Description
- Not found
- Founded
- Not found
- HQ / Address
- Not found
- Employees
- Not found
- Logo
- Not found
Revenue
- Reported revenue signal / mo
- Not found
- AI revenue estimate / mo
- Not found
- AI annual estimate
- Not found
- Model estimate / mo
- $99/mo
- Top-grossing rank
- Not found
- All-time revenue
- Not found
- Pricing
- Not found
Founder
Funding
Press & Links
Contacts & Socials
📝 About this app
Menu options include GIB® Site Guide information, installation videos, and 'Best Practice' recommendations. Moreover, it also provides quick access to GIB® compound information, including drying times, and GIB® system literature.
GIB® Site Guide tabs are segmented into common topics for quick information search, and under the GIB® systems literature tab, you can open a corresponding PDF file, e.g. a system book, to find further information.… View full description on the official store →
Tech & Domain Intel — gib.co.nz
- Tech stack
- Microsoft 365 · Anthropic · Google Workspace · Mailgun
Track this app’s revenue
FREE📝 Description
95
Why low confidence: only 0 ratings · no founder-verified revenue (model estimate only) · revenue figure is directional only.
GIB® Plasterboard is a very early-stage Android app in the books & reference space with weak public traction — only 0 ratings, no founder-verified MRR, and not ranked in any monitored grossing chart. The app appears to be monetised, but public signals are too sparse for a precise revenue estimate.
Bottom line: treat all revenue, audience and acquisition-value numbers on this page as directional only — not founder-verified facts.



