Classic Digital Faces - Watchf
50
Quality Score
Solid
✍️ Bumetric analysis
“
Classic Digital Faces - Watchf is an Android app from azya in the Health & Fitness category, currently rated 3.5★ across 100 ratings. Initial signal reads as mixed reviews: supporters praise core features while critics cite stability and value gaps.
Quality Score is 50: Solid (established niche player). For a Health & Fitness app, that means established niche player. The full BU Investment Matrix below scores 8 dimensions including monetisation, growth, and operational risk.
Track changes month-over-month in the Performance section below: live snapshot history and revenue forecast included.
💰 Monthly revenue · now vs forecast
● Right now
$3.1K
per month
→
12-mo forecast
$2.7K – $9.6K
per month
→
24-mo forecast
$2.5K – $22.3K
per month
INDIE tier
💡 Grow this revenue
Free AI audit of this app’s store listing
- Title & subtitle keyword fit
- Description hook & conversion structure
- Screenshots, ratings, reviews strategy
Typical impact: +2-5× organic installs
📊 Performance Tracking LIVE
1 snapshots on record
Rating
3.5
Reviews
100 reviews
Forecast Revenue / mo
$3.1K
Snapshots tracked
1
since May 2026
ONE-TIME · BUILD
💰 Estimated build cost
$165K
↳ What it cost to build · not monthly revenue
Likely range $125K – $225K
$25K · MVP floor
$100K · indie scale
$500K+ · studio build
📈
Pays back in ~4.5y at current MRR
Synthetic estimate. Inputs: category complexity, file size, screen count, monetization layer, platform reach, age × team-size proxy. Calibrated against 2024-2026 indie-agency rate surveys. Full math + source list on /methodology.
Where the money goes
| 🧱 MVP baseline (design + 1-store ship) | +$28K |
| 📱 5 unique screens × $4.5K | +$22K |
| ⚙ Health & Fitness complexity ×1.40 | +$20K |
| 🌐 Cross-platform reach (iOS + Android) | +$38K |
| ⚙ 8.8y maintenance × ~1-person team | +$53K |
Total estimate
$165K
ONE-TIME · EXIT VALUE
💵 Estimated acquisition value
$45K
↳ What it would sell for · not monthly revenue
Marketplace range $35K – $50K · 15× MRR multiple
💸
~0.3× build cost (under-water)
Synthetic estimate. Multiple band derived from ad-supported + age, rating quality, category demand, and user-base maturity. Calibrated against 2024-2026 indie-app-marketplace closed-deal medians. Full math + comparable deal list on /methodology.
How the multiple was built
| 📺 Ad-supported base | 15× MRR |
| 📅 8.8y proven track record | +20% |
| ⭐ ★ rating < 3.5 (weak) | -18% |
| 🏷 Health & Fitness category multiple | +10% |
| ⭐ Small user base (<1K ratings) | -8% |
Final multiple
15× MRR
👥 Estimated audience size
4.9K
Lifetime downloads (US-equivalent)
Monthly active
630
Daily active
220
Synthetic estimate from ratings × category benchmarks. Calibrated against 2024-2026 mobile-attribution retention + DAU/MAU reports. Numbers are US-storefront-equivalent — true global audience can be 5-10× larger for international apps. Full math + source list on /methodology.
How we sized it
| 📲 Health & Fitness engagement | ~70 installs / rating |
| 📅 8.8y of rating accumulation | -30% |
| 🔁 Health & Fitness D30 retention | 22% |
| 📍 DAU / MAU stickiness | 0.35 |
DAU / MAU
35% sticky
🛠 Estimated tech stack
🤖
Native Android (Kotlin)
High confidence · 80%
Also possible
Flutter
Heuristic guess from app bundle size, category, store description signals, and release-date stack era. Bumetric does not disassemble binaries — for binary-level certainty you would need an SDK intelligence tool or the manifest itself. Reasoning chain on the right. Full ruleset on /methodology.
Signals we read
| 🏷 Category context | Health & Fitness |
| 📦 Compact Android bundle | → Native Kotlin |
💀 Maintenance status
Likely abandoned
95%
Last shipped 2017-12-23 · 3198 days ago
0 · Active
50 · At risk
100 · Abandoned
Heuristic risk score from time-since-last-update + ratings velocity proxy + Editor's Choice / curated featuring signals. Calibrated against 2024-2025 app-store ranking decay reports. Not a guarantee — a quiet app with a healthy codebase looks the same as an abandoned one until something breaks. Full math on /methodology.
Risk signals
| 📅 8y+ since last update | Likely abandoned |
| 👥 Small user base (100 ratings) + 8.8y old | +10% (solo-project pattern) |
Verdict
Likely abandoned
🔬
How we forecast this revenue
MEDIUM CONFIDENCEBaseline
$3.1K/mo · ML-estimated from 234 triggers
Growth rate
+6.0% MoM · INDIE tier baseline (compound monthly)
6 months
$2.6K – $6.1K
12 months
$2.7K – $9.6K
24 months
$2.5K – $22.3K
Compound growth at +6.0% MoM (tier baseline for INDIE). Range widens with horizon — typical noise band ±40% at 6mo.. Ranges widen with horizon — distant futures carry more uncertainty.
📊
BU Investment Matrix
Early-stage solo · 41/100INDIE TIERexpected for tierGrowth Velocity
5.0
Founder Strength
6.0
Product Quality
4.8
Revenue Strength
3.5
Monetization Maturity
1.0
Defensibility
7.2
Market Position
0.0
Operational Safety
5.0
- 💰 Revenue: Modest — $1K - $7K/mo · INDIE tier · medium confidence, trajectory unclear.
- ⭐ Quality: 3.46★ across 100 reviews — below category median.
- 📍 Market: Not yet charting in any of the 9 monitored markets.
- 📈 Growth: ⚠ last update 3192d ago — possibly dormant.
- ⚠️ Risk: Elevated — dormant (3192d since update).
🎯 For competitors: Vulnerable. Quality drift + slow updates create a clear opening for a fresh competitor with active dev cadence.
💵 For acquirers: Estimated asking range 18-32× monthly = $54K-$97K.
Composite of 8 dimensions computed deterministically from public signals — no LLM, every score traces back to a measurable input. Default weights shown; "compete" / "acquire" / "invest" lenses re-weight without re-fetching.
Range:
💰 Forecast Revenue / mo
MODELRevenue forecast computed from BU's 234 trigger model on each snapshot. Calibrated against ground-truth from 58 verified-revenue apps.
🔬Forecast Breakdown — Why This Estimate?Top 5 of 5 triggers
Our ML model uses 200+ signals from public data. These are the most influential for this app:
| Paid app ($1.49)METRIC | +$2,800 | |
| 5 starREVIEW | +$1,800 | |
| Below-average rating (3.5★)METRIC | −$1,500 | |
| Mature app (8y old)METRIC | +$1,500 | |
| Pre-traction phase (100 ratings)METRIC | −$300 |
METRIC = structural app data · REVIEW = mined from user reviews · ✓ VERIFIED = Stripe-verified anchor (TrustMRR)
📈 Reviews Growth
LIVECumulative review count from first BU snapshot. Each point = a tracked update.
⭐ Rating Trend
LIVEAverage rating evolution. Updates with each new review batch.
Profile & Insights
Everything we know — and don't — about this app and its company.
Identification
- App name
- Classic Digital Faces - Watchf
- Developer
- azya
- Bundle ID
- com.azya.fitbit.classicdigitalfaces
- App Store URL
- Open in App Store
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Content rating
- Not found
- Languages
- Not found
Company
- Website
- Not found
- Tagline
- Not found
- Description
- Not found
- Founded
- Not found
- HQ / Address
- Not found
- Employees
- Not found
- Logo
- Not found
Revenue
- Reported revenue signal / mo
- Not found
- AI revenue estimate / mo
- Not found
- AI annual estimate
- Not found
- Model estimate / mo
- $3.1K/mo
- Top-grossing rank
- Not found
- All-time revenue
- Not found
- Pricing
- Not found
Founder
Founder data not yet collected for this app.
Funding
Funding data not yet collected for this app.
Press & Links
Press & Links data not yet collected for this app.
Contacts & Socials
Contacts & Socials data not yet collected for this app.
Profile is built from iTunes Lookup + developer site scrape + ML revenue model. Empty fields show "Not found" — additional sources (Crunchbase, X, IndieHackers, Acquire.com) coming.
📝 About this app
Classic Digital Fases is a set of clock faces for Fitbit Ionic, made in the style of classic digital watches.
All the dials have the following options:
- Display of user activity - you can select any combination;
- LCD color selection;
- Time format selection;
- Ability to prohibit the screen off.
NOTE These watch faces are only compatible with firmware version 27.31.1.16 and more.
App version for the Versa you can buy here - bit.ly/2ID77Jc
All the dials have the following options:
- Display of user activity - you can select any combination;
- LCD color selection;
- Time format selection;
- Ability to prohibit the screen off.
NOTE These watch faces are only compatible with firmware version 27.31.1.16 and more.
App version for the Versa you can buy here - bit.ly/2ID77Jc
App Specs
🔐 Own this app? Claim & verify MRR →🔖 v1.2🔄 updated 8y ago📂 Health & Fitness💰 Free🚀 Launched 2017 (8y old)
🔔
Track this app’s revenue
FREEGet an email when revenue moves by your threshold. No spam, unsubscribe in one click.
📝 Description
95
BU Score · Transcendent
More by azya
View all →📦 Portfolio summaryINDIE studio
16apps·$54K/mocombined
✓ Diversified — top app contributes 11%; risk spread across portfolio
About this analysis
Why medium confidence: 100 ratings · no founder-verified revenue (model estimate only).
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
10 answers · auto-generated from this app's public dataHow much does Classic Digital Faces - Watchf make per month?▴
Based on our ML-calibrated revenue forecast, Classic Digital Faces - Watchf earns approximately $3.1K/mo. This is a US-storefront-equivalent estimate; global revenue can be several times larger for internationally-distributed apps. See the methodology page for the full formula and confidence bands.
Is Classic Digital Faces - Watchf profitable?▴
With estimated build cost $165K and monthly revenue $3.1K, Classic Digital Faces - Watchf looks slow ROI — payback period is around 4.5 years at the current run-rate. Profitability also depends on paid-acquisition spend and refund rate which the public model doesn't see.
How many users does Classic Digital Faces - Watchf have?▴
Estimated audience: ~4K lifetime downloads, ~630 monthly active users, and ~220 daily active users. Derived from ratings count × category installs-per-rating × age decay. US-storefront-equivalent — global audience can be 5-10× larger for internationally-distributed apps.
What apps are like Classic Digital Faces - Watchf?▴
Browse the full Health & Fitness category catalog to find similar apps with revenue, build cost, audience and tech stack data. Each /p/{slug} page also shows a Compare side-by-side widget with three peer apps from the same niche.
What is Classic Digital Faces - Watchf built with?▴
Our heuristic places Classic Digital Faces - Watchf on the Native Android (Kotlin) stack (High confidence, 80%). Signals: app bundle size, category context, store-description markers, release-date era. We don't disassemble binaries. Alternative possibilities: Flutter.
Is Classic Digital Faces - Watchf still actively maintained?▴
Maintenance status: Likely abandoned (95% abandonment risk). Last shipped version was 8+ years ago. The risk score combines time-since-last-update with Editor's Choice / curated featuring + user-base maturity adjustments.
How much would Classic Digital Faces - Watchf sell for?▴
Estimated acquisition value: $45K (marketplace range $35K – $50K). Calculated as 15× monthly revenue using the standard multiple for the detected monetization model + adjustments for age, rating quality and category demand. Calibrated against 2024-2026 Flippa / Acquire.com / MicroAcquire closed-deal medians.
When was Classic Digital Faces - Watchf last updated?▴
Classic Digital Faces - Watchf last shipped a new version on 2017-12-23 — more than 8 year(s) ago. This is the date Apple / Google last accepted a new build, not a content-only push.
Who makes Classic Digital Faces - Watchf?▴
Classic Digital Faces - Watchf is published by azya on the Google Play Store. See the full publisher portfolio (other apps by the same developer) via the More by developer block on the product page above.
What is Classic Digital Faces - Watchf's BU Score?▴
Classic Digital Faces - Watchf has a BU Score of 50/100 (Solid). The score combines App Store rating, ratings count, monetization model and revenue signals calibrated against founder-verified MRR anchors. See the BU Score formula.