Slick Climb Pro: Bad squirrels

0
Slick Climb Pro: Bad squirrels is an Android app from Neocom Software Corporation, currently rated — across few ratings. Initial signal reads as no scraped reviews yet: judgment based on metadata only.
Quality Score is 0: Niche (micro-niche or pre-traction stage). For an app like this, that means micro-niche or pre-traction stage. The full BU Investment Matrix below scores 8 dimensions including monetisation, growth, and operational risk.
Track changes month-over-month in the Performance section below: live snapshot history and revenue forecast included.
- Title & subtitle keyword fit
- Description hook & conversion structure
- Screenshots, ratings, reviews strategy
📊 Performance Tracking LIVE
Synthetic estimate. Inputs: category complexity, file size, screen count, monetization layer, platform reach, age × team-size proxy. Calibrated against 2024-2026 indie-agency rate surveys. Full math + source list on /methodology.
| 🧱 MVP baseline (design + 1-store ship) | +$28K |
| 📱 5 unique screens × $4.5K | +$22K |
| 🌐 Cross-platform reach (iOS + Android) | +$27K |
| ⚙ 10.9y maintenance × ~1-person team | +$65K |
Synthetic estimate. Multiple band derived from ad-supported + age, rating quality, category demand, and user-base maturity. Calibrated against 2024-2026 indie-app-marketplace closed-deal medians. Full math + comparable deal list on /methodology.
| 📺 Ad-supported base | 15× MRR |
| 📅 10.9y proven track record | +20% |
Heuristic guess from app bundle size, category, store description signals, and release-date stack era. Bumetric does not disassemble binaries — for binary-level certainty you would need an SDK intelligence tool or the manifest itself. Reasoning chain on the right. Full ruleset on /methodology.
| 🏷 Category context | category |
| 📦 Compact Android bundle | → Native Kotlin |
How we forecast this revenue
LOW CONFIDENCEBU Investment Matrix
Pre-traction · 38/100INDIE TIERlimited signal- 💰 Revenue: Marginal — $200 - $1250/mo · INDIE tier · medium confidence, trajectory unclear.
- ⭐ Quality: None★ across 0 reviews — weak — significant quality concerns.
- 📍 Market: Not yet charting in any of the 9 monitored markets.
- 📈 Growth: Insufficient signal to assess trajectory.
- ⚠️ Risk: Low — no material risk signals detected.
💰 Forecast Revenue / mo
MODEL📈 Reviews Growth
LIVE⭐ Rating Trend
LIVEProfile & Insights
Identification
- App name
- Slick Climb Pro: Bad squirrels
- Developer
- Neocom Software Corporation
- Bundle ID
- com.neocomgames.slickclimbpro
- App Store URL
- Not found
- Category
- Not found
- Content rating
- Not found
- Languages
- Not found
Company
- Website
- neocom-mobile.com
- Tagline
- Not found
- Description
- Not found
- Founded
- Not found
- HQ / Address
- Not found
- Employees
- Not found
- Logo
- Not found
Revenue
- Reported revenue signal / mo
- Not found
- AI revenue estimate / mo
- Not found
- AI annual estimate
- Not found
- Model estimate / mo
- $500/mo
- Top-grossing rank
- Not found
- All-time revenue
- Not found
- Pricing
- Not found
Founder
Funding
Press & Links
Contacts & Socials
📝 About this app
Swipe on the tree as fast as you can to climb as high as possible. Be careful, you need to avoid angry squirrels (collect acorns for it), beetles and birds!
Climb higher, survive longer and never give up! You're stronger than timber!
Who is the Best Climber in the World? Challenge your friends in this addictive climbing game!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/NeocomSoftware
FaceBook: https://www.facebook.com/NeocomSoftware
Tree climbing games - it is not hill climb, this is a small time killer game with funny climbing man!
Track this app’s revenue
FREE📝 Description
95
More by Neocom Software Corporation
View all →Why low confidence: only 0 ratings · no founder-verified revenue (model estimate only) · revenue figure is directional only.
Slick Climb Pro: Bad squirrels is a very early-stage Android app with weak public traction — only 0 ratings, no founder-verified MRR, and not ranked in any monitored grossing chart. The app appears to be monetised, but public signals are too sparse for a precise revenue estimate.
Bottom line: treat all revenue, audience and acquisition-value numbers on this page as directional only — not founder-verified facts.




